The following post was written by a guest blogger. It's views do not
necessarily reflect the views of P.O.V.
By Megan Broutain
I am all about empowering parents to make their own
choices and I am all for women not judging other women on their mothering
abilities or limitations. I am a firm believer in democracy and the power of an
engaged citizenry. I am a card carrying member of the freedom of speech and
would fight for anyone’s right to spew insanities, if they so wish. Because I
am not perfect, as a parent or as a woman, because the alternative is not
acceptable and because I can easily stop listening or change the channel on my
TV.
I can see the grey area in any argument, provided it
is reasonably posited and backed with supporting facts. I may lean for or
against a piece of argument, based on my own personal preference and past
experience, but I don’t know everything so I’m generally open to hearing your
side.
But, there are some things -- in parenting, politics
and life in general -- that are simply common sense. Touting counter-logic as
an alternative lifestyle choice will simply not fly.
Allow me to demonstrate:
·
If you teach your children that hitting
is bad, then turn around and use spanking to discipline them, don’t be
surprised that your non-violent stand is not sticking. Children learn
vicariously through the adults who influence them. It’s do as I do, not do as I
say.
·
If you want to extol the virtues of extended
breastfeeding because it is a private choice, then don’t pose for the cover of
a magazine with your boob in your three to four year-old’s mouth. It’s
incongruent at best. You can have private or you can have public, you can’t
have both; I’m afraid they are mutually exclusive.
·
By the same token, if you want to sell
magazines for their content, don’t put a questionable photo on its cover and
flank it with a confrontational question then wonder why no one is taking your
content seriously.
·
If you are discontent with the
divisiveness of the political discourse around you, starting a sentence with
“you people” will not really demonstrate the opposite, will it?
·
If you run for political office, your
political voting record and your past political positions are part of your platform, whether you like it or not. You cannot
pick and choose which ones you can list on your current resumé.
·
And by the same token, if you promise
something, publically, and garner support for and because of it, don’t be
surprised when you are expected to deliver on that promise. Sticking your head
in the sand and playing ostrich will not get you off the hook.
So there you have it, folks: Cognitive dissonance --
be it in parenting, politics or life in general -- is not persuasive. Period.
Megan Broutian blogs at Monday Morning Musings and The Behavioral Child.

I enjoyed this! I think that you hit the nail on the head with your examples. Although I'm a product of spanking without a history of violence. But, there's always an exception to every rule. I especially agree with your political points. Too many people believe talk over action.
ReplyDeleteI agree on all of those points, except the spanking one. I think most children understand the difference between a punishment and their choice to hit someone.
ReplyDelete